INTRODUCTION
For
the next few dozen minutes, I am going to speak my mind, and you are going to
listen. Then you can have at me. But you must hear me out. If you have a
problem with that, I have men standing by with lip-zippers for those who
request it. After I'm done, you can unzip and hoot and holler all you want.
I
told you I didn't come here with kind words. You want sugar-coated
huggy-kissies? Then get Kerry back up here. You want someone to promise you
perpetual free money? Then get Kerry back up here.
If
you can't stand what I am saying, I have a bunch of cotton you can stick in you
ears. You all remember what cotton represents, don't you? Anyone with cotton in
their ears of course will be in peril of remaining in bondage.
THE
NAACP
The
NAACP leadership has roundly attacked me over the years; let me now return the
favor. I'm my view; the NAACP has turned into the NAGDCP- National Advancement
for the Government Dependence of Colored People.
From
what I've seen the NAACP has a mix of ignorant, immature, greedy, racist,
tunnel-visioned, and opportunistic leadership bent with a foul
self-perpetuating purpose that relies on keeping blacks down on perpetual
handouts as slaves to the Welfare system.
NAACP
mistakes their promotion of government dependence as civil rights activity, and
any black rising above that is to them 'shameful'.
The
NAACP is a focus group. I can't go to them on broader issues. Example, what is
the NAACP's stance on gay marriage? They have only their self interests in mind.
WAR
ON TERRORISM
War
on Terrorism: Iraq: Economic Sanctions vs. Use of Military: Do the Math:
First
you have this:
International
Herald Tribune statement March 2000
The
sanctions regime imposed on the people of Iraq for over a decade is one of the great
injustices of our time. It has brought starvation and disease to millions of
innocent Iraqis. UNICEF has shown that economic sanctions have contributed to
the death of half a million children. (author's note: this did nothing to
Saddam, it only strengthened him.)
Now
you have this:
www.antiwar.com
last updated 7/14/04:
At
least 5,000 civilians may have been killed during the invasion of Iraq, an
independent research group has claimed. As more evidence is collated, it says,
the figure could reach 10,000. (author's note: this action did bring down
Saddam).
Now
let's do the math:
(1)
Liberal Economic Sanctions: 500,000 dead children alone, starvation and disease
to millions of innocent Iraqis, and Saddam and Son's still in power, toying
with WMD's.
(2)
The offer to allow Saddam to step down, then the use of military to oust him:
5,000 to 10,000 civilian deaths, Saddam and Son's gone, one terrorist-tied
tyranny down and Democracy taking root in the Middle East.
Conclusion:
It
doesn't take a degree in math to figure this one out- which course of action
was more humane, AND more successful.
Let
me reiterate: Economic Sanctions: starvation and disease to millions of
innocents, 500,000 dead children, Saddam still in power;
Ultimatum
backed up with Force: 5,000 to 10,000 innocents dead, Saddam gone.
Again:
millions starving and diseased, a half-million dead children vs. 5,000-10,000.
Again:
Millions starving and diseased, and 500,000 dead, objective not achieved, vs.
5,000-10,000, objective achieved. Let me draw a picture (get’s easel and
marker). And a graph. Now which method killed more people? Which method is more
humane? Which method achieved it’s objective? Now who’s playing games, me or
the Democrats? Again: half-a-million dead children alone vs. 5,000. Who’s got
the wisdom? Who’s on the right course?
NAACP
"Bush murdered people for oil"
I
would never have gone into Iraq if Saddam left the country, so that argument
holds no water, or oil.
"Saddam
did not attack the US."
It
doesn't take a genius to see that Saddam was a part of the problem of tyranny that did
finally spill over to the United States. Further, imagine trying to pursue terrorists around the Middle and Near East with Saddam and Sons offering a safe haven. Pakistan helps the US hunt terrorists down. Can you imagine Saddam and Sons doing the same? No. Most importantly, there were two mistakes I could have made- (1) Remove Saddam and find that he wasn't hiding any WMD's from the inspectors (who were there at great American expense, by the way), and (2) Leave Saddam alone and discover too late that he did have WMD material, discovering it only after he slipped some to his co-anti-US terrorist friends and after they used it in America. The path was and is simple and clear. To pretend not see it takes pure political will.
Democrats
platform based on Bush's mishandling of Iraq.
It's
easy to sit back and criticize, especially on something that is being done for
the first time in human history- liberating a country without conquering it,
and not intending to stay for years and years, as with Japan and Germany.
Anyone can look back and see what went wrong. Where are they when its time to
look ahead and say what is going to work? Where is the Democrat's crystal ball?
They do not have one, and yet are armchair critics.
Liberals
"Terrorism should not be fought militarily."
It
would be a police action if terrorists were not State-sponsored, They are, and
therefore it is a problem beyond police action. The tactic of more liberal
economic sanctions is a proven failure, and is unthinkable at this point.
"No
link between Saddam's former regime and Al Qaeda."
Liberals
like say this with no proof. It is not my job to give a dictator who has a
desire to obtain WMD's the benefit of the doubt.
"Not
enough troops in Iraq."
Statement
based on two erroneous assumptions: (1) that Iraqis do not want to police
themselves; (2) That there is a major uprising, a liberal-media myth.
"Bush
bad because he used God to justify removing Saddam by direct force."
Liberals
miss the point, Bush was countering Muslim's self-centric ideology. Also the
liberals only attack Bush and say nothing, NOTHING, of the Muslims doing the
same thing.
"I
don't understand the complexities of what I'm getting the US into."
This
statement is just an excuse for cowardice. There is nothing complex about what
is wrong with the Middle East, or what is right and wrong in today's world.
Killing civilians in mass numbers to obtain you political aims- only a fool, an
opposition Party member, or a professional cynic would refuse to admit that is
wrong (note that the cynic would say it is wrong only if the US did it).
"Removing
Saddam took away from war on Terrorism."
Just
the opposite. It sucked terrorists in, and now the new Iraqi government is
rightly exterminating them.
"Bush
created more terrorists than there otherwise would have been."
Mere
conjecture, since we haven't seen the "otherwise".
"Quagmire
in Iraq"
Pure
liberal media-wash.
“I
should have attacked country x or y instead of Iraq”
Any
other country would have been a sideshow, and less of a statement, and less at
the heart of the Middle East problem; and all other countries were less of an
immediate threat concerning WMD’s.
2000
ELECTION
Did
I steal the election? No. Did Gore try his best to win it? Yes. Did his
supporters stoop to underhanded means? Some say yes. Filling in ballots during
the recount and eating the evidence- the chads. Were the Republicans up to any
tricks? Some say yes- barring felons from voting. Were the Democrats interested
in making every vote count? No, they tried to block overseas military votes.
Was anything the Democrats or Republicans did illegal? Some say yes on both
sides. Did the NAACP seize the opportunity to get money from the State of
Florida out of it all? Yes they did. Where is that huge sum of money now? Ask
your leaders.
9/11:
9/11 and Fighter Jets
The
subsequent highjacked airliners were not shot down because (1) no plane has
ever been shot down over US airspace; (2)
this act had no precedence, (3) the planes were already over populated
areas; (4) no one knew the plane's intent, or if it could be talked down. Blame
the liberals for creating a mentality of negotiating, which stayed the hand of
the military. Suppose an airliner was shot down before it's intent was
apparent? What an outrage that would have been! Their intent was not apparent
until it was too late.
PREJUDICE
"No
Blacks or Women Presidents of the US because of social injustice."
On
the contrary, anyone can step up to the plate. There have been blacks, women,
and black women candidates. On the other hand, just look at the quality of the
two highest profile blacks who ran for president, Jesse Jackson and Al
Sharpton- from what I can see, two tax-dodging publicity hounds, one a thug,
the other a buffoon, neither with a very high regard for American values.
Prejudice
Everyone
is prejudiced against in some way or other somewhere. Don't think you're
special. And look in the mirror if you want to see a prejudiced person. So
don't stand there and lecture me about prejudice. It is a universal problem.
REPUBLICAN
PARTY
"Republican
tax cut is self-indulgent."
On
the contrary, Democrats are self-indulgent when they give away other people's money
in order to make themselves feel like Gods, not knowing the damage they are
doing to the economy and the family.
SOCIALIST
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Kerry
is for socialistic healthcare, a proven failure in European countries. Further,
the middle class again will fund this, and get nothing in return, and there
will be abuses to no end.
A
proven failure: Example 1: France- has socialistic prescription plan. Not only
is it bankrupting the country, but also 23% of the population is hooked on
prescriptions. Example 2: The Netherlands- has a socialistic disability
program. Not only is that also bankrupting the country, but also 16% of their
workforce is out on disability, PERMANENT disability!
Disease
control I support. National pill-popping? No.
Liberal
Claim: "Cheney lied about the cost of Medicare."
Typical
liberal illogic- equating the inability to predict the future with lying, and
misinterpreting the word "estimate" with "actual".
THE
BLACK FAMILY
70%
of your children are illegitimate. That's 70% bastard children. Is that a proud
statistic for a black man? If you say yes you go against the wisdom of the
ages. I did not say I came here with kind words. What do you have to do? Wake
up and rise up! Shed the bonds of Democratic free money- it doesn't do anybody
any good.
Black
males, why would they want to stick around and raise kids, when the Democratic
Party promises to do just that with free money? It is an inside joke among
Black men that they have a kid in every state. This is what the Democratic
Party has created. Do black mothers like raising their children without men
around? No they don't! Do black mothers want their children to grow up to be in
bondage to the Welfare system? No, they don't! Do the Democrats or the NAACP
want the children of black mothers to grow up strong and independent? No, they
don't!
FREE
MONEY
You've
received entitlements for the last 3-4 generations, now what are you going to do?
Are you going to let your Democrats keep you in a stupor, or are you ready to
begin contributing to humanity? Some will answer "Heck No! This
boo-hooey-poor-person act is all a big con-game, you stupid, white,
bleeding-heart sucker!" Others will answer they are already contributing.
What about you in the middle? You're standing on a perilous fence. On the one
side there are those who will pull you down into the morass of frightful
government dependence. On the other, there is a path. You know where it leads,
but you don't know where it goes to get there. If the government does anything
to actually help you, it will be when you make the decision to get off that
fence and begin the journey along that path. The government can only be the
Park Ranger, keeping the hungry bears at bay. You will have to force your own
feet to take those steps.
Let's
pretend America was a communist state. Would you be: a 'from each according to
his ability' or would you be a 'to each according to his needs'? Would you even
survive? Which do you think vote Republican? Which do you think vote Democrat?
Are you voting Democrat for the free money they perpetually promise you? Of
course. Does this contribute to the economy? No. Does it create jobs? No. Is it
a burden on the economy? Yes. Does it keep you and those who are paying for you
down? Yes. Do you need leadership in breaking the cycle? Yes. Should they be
black leaders? IF they aren't corrupt and can do the job without corrupting it.
And don't be so prejudiced when it comes to help. Someone may finally be
looking past your skin and you won't even see it.
Will
you give something back to the world, or will you continue to ask for more, and
be a perpetual burden on society?
Are
there Niggers in this country? Yes, but a new set of people have taken the
place- the White middle class. It is they who support, by the sweat of their
brow, the big free-money con-game between you and the Democrats. Yes, the White
middle-class are the new Niggers in town. It's why you haven't risen up after 4
generations of free money, and why you won't rise up after 4 more generations
of free money. Well, there IS a new people rising up in America, and it’s not
you, it’s the White Middle Class, they will free themselves, and they will do
it by voting Republican now. That will force your community’s hand, and that
will not be as satisfying or self-respecting as if you took the initiative
yourselves.
Now
what person will get off his feet without a deadline? Precious few of us, and
they are the industry leaders we rely on for jobs, many who never see the light
of day. Does the black community have a deadline for getting off their feet?
No. Does the NAACP or the Democratic Party want a deadline for getting off your
feet? No. Their unimaginative purposes are based on keeping you down and on
handouts, while the rest of the world passes you by, and regardless of the
perpetual whining, demanding burdens you become on society. It does not shine a
bad light on them, only on you. What's it to them? They shine in their deceiving
efforts of trying to 'help' you. They make themselves feel good in this
deception, not knowing the damage they are doing. Heaven forbid you SHOULD
succeed, they would then have to search for a new purpose.
What
have you given back, after 50 years of entitlements and programs? Riots?
Criminals? Pushers? Bandits? Pimps? Is this what 50 years of free Democratic
money has produced? No wonder Democrats are a criminal's best friend, and are
weak on law enforcement- because they know they are the cause of the problem.
You
are the victims of rich kid's Robin Hood fantasies. They're robbin', all right,
feeling good with themselves, while making their victims fat, stupid, and lazy.
You will never be able to compete in the world as long as you cling to the Democratic
ticket. Communism found this out. Socialist countries are finding this out. You
will find this out, maybe today. Republicans represent business, and that can
be your business. The Democrats represent sloth.
The
black nation in this country has a new bondage- the Welfare system. Who wants
to perpetuate that? The Democrats, for votes, and the NAACP for a lack of an
alternate purpose.
You
think you are free? You are still slaves, you new master is the Democratic
Party, and their whip is the free money they perpetually promise you.
THE
WAR ON DRUGS
You
received entitlements and programs for 50 years in order to get you on your
feet. When are you going to get on your feet? What is keeping you off your feet?
Republican exploitation? Democratic handouts? I'll tell you the answer:
Democratic handouts. This is what the NAACP has been reduced to fighting for,
so they too continue to have an unimaginative purpose. Why get off your feet if
you can live for free? Why get an education if you can live for free? Can you
fly to the moon and back yet? Not if you're on the street corner selling drugs,
a war which is being fought for you. Many blacks I talk to politically
gravitate to the war on drugs- but then say it's a Republican conspiracy to
wipe out blacks! The nerve of the drug culture creating such a myth! And shame
on anyone who believes it after this revelation.
REPARATIONS
Concerning
reparations, you owe so much to the North it would take 10 generations of
reparations from you to repay them. You're lucky THEY aren't calling for
payment from YOU.
THE
ENVIRONMENT
I
do not give either side everything they want. I do not play to the extremes.
The KYOTO Treaty was an extreme head-in-the-clouds idea, and no signatory
nation has been able to abide by it’s extreme conditions to this date. The US plan is better constructed and
more realistic. It offers corporations tax credits for compliance in reducing
their pollution levels.
EDUCATION
NEA
and Kerry
The
NEA asked Kerry if he supported NEA policies, and the NEA threw in a few
monopolistic, anti-middle class scenarios, like opposing vouchers and tax
breaks for private school expenses (the middle class would benefit most from
them). Kerry supported this anti-middle class and monopolistic request.
NEA
and Kerry
NEA
was soft on Kerry, merely asking him if he 'supported' NEA issues. Of course
Kerry would say 'yes he supported them'. He played them like a violin. Sure he
can say he supports all they ask for, and he did- fully knowing all he has to
do is make an effort to support them- while knowing full well giving them
everything they want is another matter, and he can just blame it all on the
Republicans! How convenient. Make empty promises then blame the opposition.
No
Child Left Behind
Created
specifically for minorities.
REAGAN
"Reagan
hurt a lot of people."
Reagan
used global free enterprise to create a stronger, more competitive US economy.
LIBERALS
Liberal
Anti-White,
anti-success, anti-work, pro-government dependence.
GAY
MARRIAGE
Gay
Marriage
Politically
I am against it. Personally I am on the fence here- on the one hand it goes
against the wisdom of the ages. On the other hand, we have forgotten the
reasons behind the wisdom of the ages, and maybe we should allow such behavior
in order to rediscover them. Help me out here.
CLINTON
Clinton
quote: "A person has to say what he has to say, regardless of whether it
is true or not."
Right
after poo-pooing truth, he says Democrats don't make myths, but Republicans do.
Now what do you think the truth is?
Clinton
Quote: "I don't think it's fair for someone to be defined by his worse
moment, unless it's a crime..."
Then
he hesitated, realizing the self-incrimination of what he just said, and to get
his foot out of his mouth.
ANTI-US
CYNICISM OF THE LEFT
"US
only gets involved in international situations if there is oil involved."
Typical
liberal one-eye-blind, erroneous, and just plain slanderous/libelous anti-US
(and fashionable) cynicism. What about Haiti? Where’s the oil there, or the
financial stake, as other one-eyed liberals have claimed? Vietnam? Bosnia?
Panama? Grenada? Korea? WWII? WWI? Do you smell oil there? No. Where is the financial
stakes? None. In fact the US gave dearly.
KERRY
Kerry
reminds us "All men are created equal". Then he promises special
treatment to whichever group he is addressing at the moment…
A
BALANCED BUDGET
Sure
Clinton balanced the budget- but cutting everything except that which they
thought would perpetuate their power-, which is perpetual free money for their
most likely voters. Sly, but damaging.
GOVERNMENT
JOBS OVERSEAS
There
are jobs out there where you can help the world, even your own kind. Will you
be appreciated or understood? Rarely. Will you be attacked for being an
American? Probably. Will you be disgusted with human nature? Of course. Will
you get thanks, or perpetually be asked for more? Probably the latter. Will
they get what they want, then cast you aside? Of course, when hasn't that
happened in human history? Will you want give up? Most likely. But you will not
have been worthless. And that will be remembered.
RESPONSE
TO UNANSWERABLE QUESTION
Response
to policy question and what the President is going to do about it: "I
don't have an answer to that. What would you do if I left it up to you? What if
I said Aheeb, I want you to solve this issue. I don’t want you to make it go
away, I don't want you to address it; I don't want you deal with it; I want you
to SOLVE it. Does ANYBODY have any ideas on how to solve this problem? Here's
my email address. Any of you want to work in Washington? I'll leave
applications at the door. It's not the kind of job that will help the economy,
it's a government job, steady, usually lasts 4-8 years, sometimes boring,
sometimes frightening, always burdensome, with your usual office politics,
backstabbing, leapfrogging, gossiping, and hanky-panky, but it has a good
medical and dental plan.
There
are only a few qualifications- you've got to care. You've got to care about
people. You've got to mean what you say and say what you mean. If there is a
menace to those you're sworn to protect, you have to go after it. You'll have
the weight of the world on your shoulders, and you've got to think about
everyone. Your enemies will sneak up behind you; your friends may disown you or
try to corrupt you. Yet you've got to drop everything and be there when needed,
and look shiny clean when you’re doing it. You've got to lead. Make decisions.
Live with those decisions. Weigh criticism. Compromise. You will age 50 years,
but there is a good retirement package. Think about it.
FINAL
INSPIRATIONAL
If
you want to make it in the world, you must have something people want. Then,
wherever you go, people around you prosper. If you want to be loved in the
world, you have to have something people need. If you want to make this world a
paradise, what do you have to do? Yes! Wake up and rise up! I will give out
money for education. I will give out money for enterprise. I can't however give
out money so you can sit on your butts with an eye toward your grave. That is
not what the world needs.
Do
any of you think you are worthless? Some do think so. It is not true. You are
Americans. You may be black, but you are Americans. Now Americans may not be the most civilized people in the world,
or the most cultured, or the most suave, or the most savvy, or the best looking,
in spite of what liberals think, but when it comes to turning to someone for
help, where does the world turn? To the person who has given it in the past,
and who can give it now, and who holds hope for the future. That is an
American. The world looks to America and says, "Someday, we'll be like
Americans. We'll fly to the moon and back. We'll cure the world's diseases,
feed the world's hungry, educate the world's illiterate, but we'll do it
better, and still get no thanks for it." Maybe not with that cynical end,
but something to the former's effect. Do what the Americans did, but with a
little less pollution, a little less exploitation, a little less greed, a
little less damage, and with a little more love. What country could aspire to
more?
You
want to be on par with Whitey? What do you have to do? Yes, that's right. Wake
up and rise up! You want respect and love from the rest of the world? What do
you have to do? I can't hear you? Yes! Wake up and rise up! Yes, I am asking
you to get off of welfare. Not cold turkey. Those on it can live it out. But
you will be raising your offspring to contribute to the world, not to live off
Democratic handouts. Is that so bad? No, it is not. Will it be good for your
children when they reach adulthood, assuming they survive that long in the
Welfare state the Democrats have constructed around you? Yes. Is what the NAACP
and Democrats want? No, they will have to change, and change takes effort. It’s
easier for them to keep you down.
When
you're back on the street tomorrow, or tonight, nothing will have changed. The
world will still spin. But a little seed will have been planted in the back of
your minds tonight. It may not sprout tomorrow, or the next day, or for as long
as you live, but it will be passed on to the next generation, and the
generation after that, until it one day does sprout, and it will lift you and
your people off of your feet, and you will have arrived on the threshold of
genuine and justified self-respect, humanity, and history.
OTHER
ISSUES TO BE ADDED SHORTLY:
THE
PATRIOT ACT
ABORTION
GUN
CONTROL
JOBS
AND THE ECONOMY