|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Mixed-Up Liberal in Kansas- A response to
the liberal book "What's The Matter With Kansas?" |
|
|
The Book’s Main Theme: |
People voting Republican
against their economic and political interests. |
|
|
A
Clear Response: |
That the main theme's phenomenon
exists there is no doubt, I see ample evidence of people voting Democrat in
such a way, seeing successful middle class people voting Democrat, for a
party that hold none of their values, and that has one goal- to separate them
from their hard-earned worldly positions in order to buy votes from what they
believe are the more numerous deadbeat masses. In fact more numerous are the
enterprising Americans voting Democrat (the fact is most people vote for the
better man, explaining the Reagan landslides) in a naïve belief they are
helping others. Let’s put it this way, why do Mexicans cross the border, and
why do people immigrate to America: for the Welfare of the Democrats, or for
the enterprise valued by the Republicans? Answer: The latter. This is why
immigrants often surpass their American Democrat Party-dependent
counterparts. |
|
|
The
Author Attacks Success: |
The socially backwards author derides
those who value enterprise and 'fratboys, lawyers, and CEO's", as if
they all were born to wealth. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The
main delusion of the author is his claim that ‘people are deluded by the
right’. This derision of the author is a good example of the sick and twisted
path the present crop of liberal's misapplied, misaimed, over-generalized,
and erroneous cynicism has taken. To this liberally brainwashed author,
success is bad. |
|
|
Another
Liberal Delusion: |
Another example is the L.A. (Saddam)
Time's review comment on the inside cover: "Conservatism was once a mark
of class privilege." There is no class privilege in America. Liberals
mistake being able to afford enterprising services as 'privilege'. |
|
|
The
Book Cover Art: |
The book cover depicts a Republican
elephant standing on the back of a Democrat donkey. The cover should more
correctly shoe the liberal, decadent donkey, now a jackass, standing on the
back of the enterprising, successful Republican elephant who is doing all the
important work and is driving the economy. and actually creating jobs, while
the jackass stabs the elephant in the back. |
|
|
On
Monopolies: |
The liberal author derides
monopolies, as if they were Republican. You want a monopoly, how about the
National Education Association, bastion of public schools and the Democratic
Party, that opposes tax breaks for private school costs. |
|
|
Democratic
Party's Rearward March: |
To the author, the Democratic Party
is the party for the workers, the poor, the weak, and the victimized. Rather
than help them rise up, the Democrats attempt to punish the really hard
working and successful. |
|
|
On
Another Mindless Liberal Statement: |
And the piece de resistance: "How can
anyone who has ever worked for someone else go Republican?" Let's
analyze this mindless statement. Just what cockeyed view does this imply? Is
it implying that instead of offering your services for someone else, you
should look for handouts from the Democratic Party? Or does it imply that
people shouldn't work at all, or live off the land like savages? Does it
imply that everyone who creates a need for services (jobs) is out to exploit
the 'workers', in some mad Machevellian Marxist nightmare? |
|
Or maybe the statement implies that
only smart people, those who create jobs, are Republicans, and should be
hated, and the ignorant masses (those offering their skills and services) are
Democrats? Or does it imply that voting Democrat is a vote for taking from
those who need services and skills (from the Democrat's poor and huddled
masses whom they buy votes from) and give it to those who vote Democrat? |
|
Morally
Vacuous and Clueless: |
Author statement: "Republicans
tried to impeach Clinton 'just for fun'." Response: Typical of a
liberal, turning a blind eye to the overt moral debauchery and illegal acts
of one of their icons. |
|
|
Success
is Bad (cont.): |
The author talks about earning over
$300,000 as if it were bad- ignorant to the fact that most people who earn
that much purchase goods and services (read jobs). |
|
|
Who is
Deranged? |
The author talks about people in
Kansas voting Republican as being 'deranged', while being blind to his own
derangement of portraying the millions of leaders of American enterprise, and
the foundation of it's strength, as greedy Rolex watch-wearing monsters. |
|
|
Arguments
Sinking In: |
I only read the covers and the first
few pages, and have made numerous points. I would take the rest of the book
to task, but life is short, it would take me several decades, and the points
already made will take a long time to penetrate the hard heads of the
confused sympathizers of this kind of
Leftist drivel. |
|
|
My
concise Review: |
Let me add my inside cover review:
The book is full of crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|